Hi,
Your upload of node-monacopilot 1.1.15+ds-1 to the NEW queue has had an
automated review: an LLM-based check of its licensing and packaging, run by the
DFSG team using the Debian Inference service. It is not a decision on the
package, and - like other LLM-based work - it can be wrong.
It found 0 blocker, 0 important, 3 minor issues:
- [minor] [packaging] node-monaco-editor (<< 0.53) is tighter than the
breakage the package itself documents (0.57)
- [minor] [packaging] node-monacopilot-core's description promises the
request cache and text truncation, which live in node-monacopilot
- [minor] [packaging] Both Architecture: all packages omit Multi-Arch: foreign
You can read the full review here:
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/node-monacopilot#assistant-report
Please look at it, and respond by visiting the link below (you'll be asked to
authenticate with Salsa first):
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/llm-review/t3opyAU6tQedxaQcjELzYg5laAyanePc
There you may choose to reject the upload yourself, while you fix issues and
re-upload, or add comments to clarify or dispute the review.
Your comments are for the DFSG team member who reviews the package, not for the
LLM: it will not read them or reply. Tell the reviewer where you think the
automated review is right or wrong, and why. Comments are public and shown with
the review; you may use markdown, e.g. to link to clarifying information.
If you have any questions, please reply to this e-mail and someone from the
team will respond.
If you would rather not be e-mailed about these reviews, log in at
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org
and say so on your profile page.
Thanks!
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
