Hi,
Your upload of node-reflect-metadata 0.2.2~git20260824.acdeee4-1 to the NEW
queue has had an automated review: an LLM-based check of its licensing and
packaging, run by the DFSG team using the Debian Inference service. It is not a
decision on the package, and - like other LLM-based work - it can be wrong.
It found 1 blocker, 0 important, 1 minor issues:
- [blocker] [licensing] Files: docs/* claims MIT for the ecmarkup authors
alone, but docs/index.html and docs/spec.biblio.json are generated from the
Apache-2.0 spec.html
- [minor] [packaging] node-gulp-mocha is marked <!nocheck> although
gulpfile.js requires it for the build, not only for the tests
You can read the full review here:
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/node-reflect-metadata#assistant-report
Please look at it, and respond by visiting the link below (you'll be asked to
authenticate with Salsa first):
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/llm-review/x6nIGbvfAVzQaXMl8fzBVch7xlIVtOp-
There you may choose to reject the upload yourself, while you fix issues and
re-upload, or add comments to clarify or dispute the review.
Your comments are for the DFSG team member who reviews the package, not for the
LLM: it will not read them or reply. Tell the reviewer where you think the
automated review is right or wrong, and why. Comments are public and shown with
the review; you may use markdown, e.g. to link to clarifying information.
If you have any questions, please reply to this e-mail and someone from the
team will respond.
If you would rather not be e-mailed about these reviews, log in at
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org
and say so on your profile page.
Thanks!
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
