Hi,
Your upload of node-cmdk 1.1.1+ds-1 to the NEW queue has had an automated
review: an LLM-based check of its licensing and packaging, run by the DFSG team
using the Debian Inference service. It is not a decision on the package, and -
like other LLM-based work - it can be wrong.
It found some issues:
- [important] [packaging] Package installs no ESM entry point although
cmdk/package.json exports ./dist/index.mjs
- [minor] [packaging] Runtime Depends on node-typescript, which is needed
only to build
- [minor] [packaging] Upstream URLs disagree: debian/copyright and Homepage
say pacocoursey/cmdk, the tarball and upstream/metadata say dip/cmdk
You can read the full review here:
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/node-cmdk#assistant-report
Please look at it, and respond by visiting the link below (you'll be asked to
authenticate with Salsa first):
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/llm-review/ik7HLMOidlJL9gHU0sVpseSd1E1D1cOb
There you may choose to reject the upload yourself, while you fix issues and
re-upload, or add comments to clarify or dispute the review.
Your comments are for the DFSG team member who reviews the package, not for the
LLM: it will not read them or reply. Tell the reviewer where you think the
automated review is right or wrong, and why. Comments are public and shown with
the review; you may use markdown, e.g. to link to clarifying information.
If you have any questions, please reply to this e-mail and someone from the
team will respond.
If you would rather not be e-mailed about these reviews, log in at
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org
and say so on your profile page.
Thanks!
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
