On Wednesday 13 March 2013 16:13:41 Jérémy Lal wrote: > Dominique, while it is very nice of you to help, > i'm not that happy with these commits :
Ah. Sorry about that. I'll try to fix my mess... > as you have noticed npm needs > dfsg-repackaging, and it was a good occasion to exclude all node_modules. > I would have really appreciated you did the same with that upstream update. You mean that all node_modules shipped with npm must be removed from upstream tarball ? > It would have been more helpful to ask before doing actual commits. > What must be done before this npm update is updating/packaging all its > dependencies, meaning packaging first node-gyp and its deps. I can try node-gyp. I've found the old repo on collab-maint. Should I update it with node-gyp 0.9.1 ? > This is > where help is needed. Updating npm itself is easy, and i am currently > working on nodejs 0.10 update. > Also the plan is to upload everything to experimental until wheezy is out, > and then to setup a transition to nodejs 0.10 / npm 1.2. Sound reasonable. All the best -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org _______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel