On 11/10/13 11:22, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Daniel Pocock (2013-10-11 10:22:48) >> On 11/10/13 10:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>> On 11/10/2013 09:47, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>>> I'm just wondering if anybody else thinks a wheezy-backports >>>> version of nodejs is feasible? >>>> >>>> I've run it on wheezy and built my own packages (pegjs, jssip) on >>>> wheezy and all seems OK >>> Do you backport libv8 too ? >> Just looking at the system where I did this, I notice it is not pure >> wheezy >> >> It has a version of libv8 depending on libc >= 2.14 - I simply pulled >> the packages selectively from testing some months ago >> >> Has anybody tried a build of libv8 in a pure wheezy system? > I suspect you mean libv8-3.14 - libv8 is same version in stable, testing > and unstable. > > I have not (yet) backported libv8-3.14 to stable, but I have backported > nodejs-0.6.19~dfsg1 to stable, and backported uglifyjs, pegjs and jssip > to stable infected by that nodejs backport: > > deb http://debian.jones.dk/ wheezy javascript
Related to this, I prepared a fix for closure-compiler, one of the jssip build dependencies This should clear FTBFS: jssip and allow simplification of jssip:debian/rules and build-deps http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705565#41 _______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
