Please CC me on all replies, I don't receive mail from this mailing list due to too much node-related traffic that I don't want to see.
> In a recent bug report, I came across this disparity, > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877213#36 > > npm2deb creates source packages with node- prefix. I think the policy > should be updated to reflect this. As I mentioned on that bug report, not all javascript is node or npm. It would be totally inappropriate to rename jquery or mathjax as node-jquery or node-mathjax. My d3-format source package provides both node-d3-format and libjs-d3-format, which is a standalone javascript library that doesn't need node at all. The build does not need NPM, and it needs nodejs only to run uglifyjs. Calling a package node-XXX just because a build tool uses /usr/bin/nodejs is ridiculous, we might as well rename all/most packages to cc-XXX or gcc-XXX. More generally we should be liberating as many Debian javascript packages as possible from the shackles of the neoliberal "free-market" npm "ecosystem". X -- GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35 GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
