Hi Sandro! On Sunday 24 January 2016 03:22:47 Sandro Knauß wrote: > Hey, > > > And now that the facts are on the table I will give you my personal > > opinion: even if lots of important apps depend on it I would remove it at > > least from testing. > > I can understand your option and also think this is okay, but I would like > to get a exception for kdepim/kdepim-runtime. > > Mails are very important for users, so removing it from testing would make > it impossible for testing users to read their mails.
On the same base that mails are important for users, should we ship something that might be security-compromised and with no upstream support for something so important as mails? And mails fall exactly in the category of "app that handles unstrusted data" I'm afraid :-/ -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
