On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 09:14:53PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 08:02:18PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 05:21:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> > > wrote: > > > > Versions of packages lame depends on: > > > >... > > > > ii libmp3lame0 1:3.99.5-dmo6 > > Maybe I am confused, but shouldn't debian packages declare proper > > dependencies? The above command only fixes this on my system (where it is > > already fixed), not in the actual package which didn't have the proper > > dependency (assuming I didn't hit an apt-get bug). > > The dependencies are correct. > > What you say is only true for packages that are (or were) in Debian. > > Debian has no control over packages and their versions in 3rd party > repositories hosted elsewhere, and problems that are caused by by > installing such 3rd party packages are out of scope of what is supported > by Debian.
Especially when that repository is deb-multimedia.org which has a long
history of breaking dependency resolutions with the stock debian
packages. I recommend you just stop using that repository if you don't
have any *real* use for it, and if you do then you should probably
become more proficient at handling these kind of issues yourself.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
