On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 09:14:53PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 08:02:18PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 05:21:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> 
> > wrote:
> > > > Versions of packages lame depends on:
> > > >...
> > > > ii  libmp3lame0  1:3.99.5-dmo6
> > Maybe I am confused, but shouldn't debian packages declare proper
> > dependencies? The above command only fixes this on my system (where it is
> > already fixed), not in the actual package which didn't have the proper
> > dependency (assuming I didn't hit an apt-get bug).
> 
> The dependencies are correct.
> 
> What you say is only true for packages that are (or were) in Debian.
> 
> Debian has no control over packages and their versions in 3rd party 
> repositories hosted elsewhere, and problems that are caused by by 
> installing such 3rd party packages are out of scope of what is supported 
> by Debian.

Especially when that repository is deb-multimedia.org which has a long
history of breaking dependency resolutions with the stock debian
packages.  I recommend you just stop using that repository if you don't
have any *real* use for it, and if you do then you should probably
become more proficient at handling these kind of issues yourself.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to