Am 26.04.2010 09:39, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
I do understand that some find short-form dh7 easier to read than CDBS.
It's just a matter of taste. Before dh7 was introduced I was also in favour of CDBS, but the new override_* rules really got me. ;)
But is that enough reason for making it mandatory for new packages? So the (proposed) plan is to abandon CDBS, but tolerate it temporarily?
I think we shouldn't make anything really mandatory. IMHO it does not really help anyone but scares away the members with strong preferences for on or the other build system, e.g. Jonas.
Maybe we should just *recommend* a packaging style but still tolerate the others, as they are also perfectly valid to get things done.
-- Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath Ruhr-Universität Bochum Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT) Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134 D-44780 Bochum Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334 Fax: +49 (0)234 / 32-14227 E-Mail: greffr...@leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
