On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:03:22AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 26/08/10 07:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +0000, rosea-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:changed in build-depends libjack-dev to libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev, assuming this is the right and new approach to handle jack1 and jack2 in debian- libjack-dev (>= 0.105), + libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev,No. Above means "one of these two *specific* implementations are required".When you mean "any implementation is required", then instead use this:libjack-dev | libjack0.100.0-devNo. Your solution means either libjack-dev or a virtual package we are trying to phase out (libjack0.100.0-dev).We really need to sort this out, but for now packages should just build-depend on libjack-dev.
Ok. My main point still stands :-) Sorry for the confusion. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
