On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:28:17PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > If any other files (which are used for the resulting binaries) is > GPL-2 (i.e. without permitting later revisions), then they are > incompatible.
For my packaging stuff I usually use the same license as the upstream sources (just like an "extension" of the software itself), and so I've done in this case (since foo-yc20 is GPL-3+). > Also, it limits the ability to reuse across packages, due to same > kind of limitations. That's a good point, but I've always seen the Debian part of a package tightly related to the software it referes to and so much difficult to reuse anyway. But I lack in experience, and probably in this I'm wrong. -- perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse' _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers