On Mo, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:12:03 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Er... I just tried to find out what the reason for the .dfsg1 suffix in > our package version is, i.e. what is actualy removed from the Debian > tarball WRT the upstream tarball. It seems the information that is > puzzled across README.source, README.upstream-upgrade, > get-orig-source.sh and strip.sh is either outdated or inappropriate. > > Is strip.sh run at all? If yes, why do we still build mencoder; if not, > why does get-orig-source.sh still call it? > > Furthermore, the package uses source format 3.0 (quilt) and > README.source still talks about quilt. > > Please enlighten me (and others) and clean up this mess. ;)
Oh, I'm sorry, it seems I've drifted into too much upstream work so that I overlook such important packaging changes. Help of course as always welcome. The only change from the upstream tarballs is the removal of the libdvdcss/ directory. The README.upstream-upgrade and README.source are out of date and need to be update. Fabian, do you volunteer to update them? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers