Hi, Andres. On May 07 2011, Andres Mejia wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Alessio Treglia <ales...@debian.org> wrote: > > Added, welcome aboard!
Thanks for the warm reception, everybody! > BTW Rogério, I sent another patch to lame-dev. I believe that would be > the last change that I know of which should be pushed to lame's cvs. Can you send me it here? I guess that I won't have problems with SF's mailing lists eating attachments. :-) > All other changes for the Debian packages are Debian specific. Depending on what we have, I would be glad to integrate them in a sane manner that would make people keeping the tarball buildable on Debian-based systems. > I'll hold off on packaging a cvs snapshot of lame and instead wait for > a new release. Robert is planning to move LAME to a beta phase and, then, of course, to a releaseable version. BTW, regarding LAME, since a good amount of the active developers prefer to use CVS, while I like git (the little that I know of git), I maintain a very outdated, half-broken, and unofficial mirror of LAME here: https://github.com/rbrito/lame I would like to start over the right way and, perhaps, it would be a good idea to keep it under the pkg-multimedia-maintainers umbrella. What do you guys think of that? Regards, -- Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers