On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 06:35:30PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > What's the difference? Should ecasound2.2 be RMed?
ecasound replaces ecasound2.2, so yes, ecasound2.2 should be removed (I don't know how though). Cheers -- perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse' _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers