On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 06:35:30PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> What's the difference? Should ecasound2.2 be RMed?
ecasound replaces ecasound2.2, so yes, ecasound2.2 should be removed (I
don't know how though).
Cheers
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
