On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Paul Gevers <p...@climbing.nl> wrote: >> Then let's go with 'libav-tools', unless someone objects that is. > > Just to be sure, we are talking about the binaries here right? As the > source name seems fine with me and is no problem, right? I don't think > users would understand this name any better than ffmpeg, but I think the > lib start might frighten some unnecessary. Although I believe it is near > the least confusing alternatives, so I agree.
Well, the name 'ffmpeg' is definitely wrong, after all. Better suggestions welcome. > > Anyway, if we are going that way, please do provide a transition path > for dependencies of ffmpeg. E.g. my package Winff depends on the binary > ffmpeg (not on the libav libraries). I would hate it when that suddenly > start breaking just for a rename. Please have a look at this package: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/ffmpeg It was specifically design for migration purposes. Still, you might want to update the dependencies for your package and update it to use '/usr/bin/avconf' instead of '/usr/bin/ffmpeg'. -- regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers