On 12-02-10 at 09:59am, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 10.02.2012 09:49, schrieb Alessio Treglia: > >And regarding MPL-1.1, it says [2]: "This is a free software license > >which is not a strong copyleft; unlike the X11 license, it has some > >complex restrictions that make it incompatible with the GNU GPL. That > >is, a module covered by the GPL and a module covered by the MPL cannot > >legally be linked together. We urge you not to use the MPL for this > >reason. [...]" > > Ah, I have mixed up MPL-2.0 and MPL-1.1. > libmp4v2 is licensed under the latter. > > >So, if the faac's CLI frontend links against mp4v2 yes, it is affected > >by a serious issue and we must disable the offending linking flag. > >Otherwise, no, it isn't. > > That's a clear statement, thanks! No need for -devel this time. ;)
...or -legal ;-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
