On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:15, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >> I've been reviewing the Bits, and have a comment: >> >> The lash->ladish change is confusing. The part about a patch being >> needed is unnecessary IMO. It should be replaced by a statement of >> wether jackd1 and jackd2 support ladish (do they? I'd change it myself >> but I don't know if both do). >> >> >> I'll edit this thing a bit now (mostly cosmetic changes). > > BTW, given the current discussion on debian-devel (where people stated > they still use d-m.o for codecs), we should send the message ASAP.
I have added some additional bits regarding Libav/FFmpeg there. Who has time to finalize and send it out? -- regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
