On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/11/6 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>: >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks. As discussed previously on pkg-multimedia-maintainers, I >>> propose that we restrict archs for one package >>> "supercollider-supernova". The package is optional for users (it's a >>> non-default drop-in alternative to "supercollider-server") and there >>> is very little upstream support for getting it working across archs. >>> It uses some fancy coding and boost libs that I'm not familiar with, >>> and these are what incur these build fails. I know it would be great >>> to avoid having to special-case any archs, but I don't see where the >>> expertise will come from to do this, and supercollider is >>> fully-functional without that package. >> >> I thought sc used the problematic boost libs elsewhere so this was not >> really a workable solution... > > Hi all - just tested this on sparc/ppc porterboxes and the proposed > fix works. I've pushed the fix to git.debian.org - please could I > request a new upload, so that it's possible for the supercollider > packages to go eventually to testing?
Looks like it got built everywhere :) https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=supercollider -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
