2014-01-27 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> > Quoting Alessio Treglia (2014-01-27 13:22:27) >
Hi Jonas, > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > /usr/lib64 shouldn't be used on debian ... > > > After some discussion with him he send me a patch ... > > > Now all *.so files are installed this way: > > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lv2/synthv1.lv2/synthv1.so > > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lv2/synthv1.lv2/synthv1_ui.so > > > > That's formally correct for us, it's pointless to fix every single LV2 > > plugin just to make hosts "happier" though, we need this bug to be > > solved at upstream. > > I mean IMHO this is a matter of interface contracts as the LV2 > > specification currently does not handle multi arch at all, so I'd > > suggest to file a bug here [1] before going with any solution. > > My proposal (see separate mail) fits with above in the sense that it > treat normal builds as broken until step 4). > > Please note that multiarch is a Debian invention, so likely to not be > supported upstream and not needed to be, if only we are careful to > respect that by making support only *optional* - which is what I > propose. Multiarch is nowadays widespread in many other distributions: debian and derivatives, redhat and derivatives, opensuse, arch linux and probably others (just quick research correct me if I am wrong). So maybe asking to be multiarch supported upstream is most straightforward. best regards mira
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers