On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> wrote: > I have checked the wiki page and since the Libav/FFmpeg part feels too > biased towards Libav. I will make a separate blog post for XBMC trying > to be more balanced.
That part needs update anyway. I don't feel like populating our "bits" with allegations on the matter, and I guess others like me don't too. No more polemic, we have, already, had enough of it. Though having said that, and seen what the majority of us has publicly expressed recently, I would like to state the rationale behind our position against the proposal to replace libav with FFmpeg instead, which could be AFAICT fundamentally summaried as "it's too late for Jessie". What do you think about it? > I already blog about XBMC's state in Debian regularly [1] and it gets > aggregated to planet.d.o thus most of our users are probably aware of > the revived packages. > There is one post in the works about latest updates but I wanted to > give a few days to Libav to fix the VDPAU bug [1] hurting many users. Please add some of such interesting information to the page, I believe users will appreciate it. > I have added a note about forked-daapd, which I think would be > interesting for users. That's great, thanks. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
