On 2014-12-01 11:13:31, John David Anglin wrote: > On 12/1/2014 10:36 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > >So should this bug be reassigned to binutils? > I will file a binutils bug. Difficulty at this point is I don't have > a simple test case to demonstrate problem. Need to do some debugging. > I have no objection in reassigning the Debian bug.
Yes, please file a bug against binutils and mark this bug blocked by the binutils bug. > Presumably the borked plugin check was added for a reason, but do the > DT_NEEDED entries in various libav libaries actually cause a problem > for vlc? There is no symbol dependency as far as I can tell. No, they do not cause a problem. d/rules checks if we've put no plugin that links a X library into vlc-nox. We can probably disable the test for hppa. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
