On 09/20/2016 04:19 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi all, disclaimer: this is only an answer to your email ihaven't had a look at any specifics of the "drumkv1" package itself.
> > upstream made changes in build system and it is leading to problems. > > W: drumkv1: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libdrumkv1-0 most likely a false positive in lintian (due to the embedded version string in the source packge). so: ignore. > W: drumkv1: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdrumkv1.so.0.7.6 > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdrumkv1.so the .so-file (that is: the .so.0.7.6 file) should be in libdrumkv1-0. the symlink should be in libdrumkv1-dev. > I: drumkv1: no-symbols-control-file > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdrumkv1.so.0.7.6 you might want to generate (and maintain a d/libdrumkv1-0.symbols file. (if that's a C-library, the request is reasonable). > > I believe that file libdrumkv1.so.0.7.6 shouldn't be installed at all, > but I am not sure. if you *do have* a libdrumkv1-0 package that it should be installed. you only should have a libdrumkv1-0 package, HOWEVER all that i've written above is valid (only) if the source package provides library packages (e.g. you split it into drumkv1, libdrumkv1-0, libdrumkv1-dev,...). afaict, the package is currently unsplit (there's only a single "drumkv1" binary package). it the (supposedly new) lib*.so is of general interest (outside of the drumkv1 binary package), you might consider splitting the package up. if you think the library is too specific, the lib*.so* files should go into /usr/lib/${TRIPLET}/drumkv1/lib*.so* (adjust the build system accordingly) and these lintian warnings should be void. dmadsr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers