On 19.04.2013 23:28, David Paleino wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:52:44 +0200, colliar wrote:
Hey >> I could live with a three month delay but everything older is quite >> outdated regarding josm's development. > > I know :| > > I will try maintaining a backport, just don't expect it to be released > together > with the version in sid, expect some delay (I'd say a week is reasonable?) :) Good news. Why not just adapt migration policy from testing ? So testing and stable-backport will be the same version. I do not know your update circles. But I would expect experimental to have at maximum a delay of ten days compared to JOSM tested and unstable one month. ATM (numbers from [1] and [2]): - experimental (r5759) - six weeks - unstable (r5608) - 20 weeks - testing (r5267 with some patches) - at least eight month - stable (r3376) - two years and nine month > Thanks for your report, Always welcome Colliar ---- [1] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/DevelopersGuide/Schedule [2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/josm.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-osm-maint mailing list Pkg-osm-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-osm-maint
