On Sunday, 29 April 2018 10:11 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Nitpick (nice to have, no reason for a new upload on its own): > This changelog entry threw me, I was searching in vain for a related > source change. "Rebuild against newer newer pango fixes dependency on > transitional package (Closes: #865170)." would be a better.
Yes, I agree. Your version explains the concept far better. > 0.4.0-1 says "Switch to LGPL-2.1+ for libexif-gtk 0.4.0.". Is this > correct? While COPYING contains a copy of LGPL-2.1 only a single c/h > file (gtk-exif-util.h) has this license in its copyright header. The po files and tests/test-libexif-gtk.c are also licensed under LGPL-2.1. I see your point, though. The other files are LGPL-2. However, all of those files have "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version" written in them, which would be okay. Having said that, it may be better to fix d/copyright to account for the mixed LGPL-2/2.1 files. What do you think? It's no problem for me to do. Thanks, Hugh _______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
