Your message dated Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:06:11 -0300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#991381: Bug#991381: darktable: 
camera not showing in lens correction list and not recognised but is supported
has caused the Debian Bug report #991381,
regarding darktable: camera not showing in lens correction list and not 
recognised but is supported
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
991381: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: darktable
Version: 3.6.0-1.1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,


I have a Canon 800D.
When I open a RAW image in darkroom the lens correction always fails to detect 
the camera. It will recognize the lens but not the camera. It tells me to add 
it manually.
But the list with Canon cameras doesn't show a 800D/Rebel T7i.
Looking in /usr/share/darktable/rawspeed/cameras.xml I see that the 800D is 
supported (also the 80D is in the xml but not in the list)
I have double checked that the exif data displays the correct camera type and 
the firmware in the camera is up to date.
Not sure why multiple cameras that are inside the xml file don't show up in the 
"manual add" camera list?

This is the out put of the exiftool:
exiftool IMG_1638.CR2 | grep -i "camera.*name"
Camera Model Name : Canon EOS 800D

The fix is to add the dependency for liblensfun-bin which contains the 
lensfun-update-data tool.
Then run the lensfun-update-data to update the lensfun dbase with all the 
supported cameras.
See also my guthub issue in the darktable repo:
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/issues/9562


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers focal-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'focal-updates'), (500, 'focal-security'), (500, 'focal')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-77-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages darktable depends on:
ii  fonts-roboto             2:0~20170802-3
ii  iso-codes                4.4-1
ii  libc6                    2.31-0ubuntu9.2
ii  libcairo2                1.16.0-4ubuntu1
ii  libcolord-gtk1           0.2.0-0ubuntu1
ii  libcolord2               1.4.4-2
ii  libcups2                 2.3.1-9ubuntu1.1
ii  libcurl3-gnutls          7.68.0-1ubuntu2.5
ii  libexiv2-27              0.27.2-8ubuntu2.4
ii  libgcc-s1                10.3.0-1ubuntu1~20.04
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0       2.40.0+dfsg-3ubuntu0.2
ii  libglib2.0-0             2.64.6-1~ubuntu20.04.3
ii  libgomp1                 10.3.0-1ubuntu1~20.04
ii  libgphoto2-6             2.5.25-0ubuntu0.1
ii  libgphoto2-port12        2.5.25-0ubuntu0.1
ii  libgraphicsmagick-q16-3  1.4+really1.3.35-1
ii  libgtk-3-0               3.24.20-0ubuntu1
ii  libicu66                 66.1-2ubuntu2
ii  libilmbase24             2.3.0-6build1
ii  libjpeg8                 8c-2ubuntu8
ii  libjs-prototype          1.7.1-3
ii  libjs-scriptaculous      1.9.0-2
ii  libjson-glib-1.0-0       1.4.4-2ubuntu2
ii  liblcms2-2               2.9-4
ii  liblensfun1              0.3.2-5build1
ii  liblua5.3-0              5.3.3-1.1ubuntu2
ii  libopenexr24             2.3.0-6ubuntu0.5
ii  libopenjp2-7             2.3.1-1ubuntu4.20.04.1
ii  libosmgpsmap-1.0-1       1.1.0-6
ii  libpango-1.0-0           1.44.7-2ubuntu4
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0      1.44.7-2ubuntu4
ii  libpng16-16              1.6.37-2
ii  libpugixml1v5            1.10-1
ii  librsvg2-2               2.48.9-1ubuntu0.20.04.1
ii  libsecret-1-0            0.20.4-0ubuntu1
ii  libsoup2.4-1             2.70.0-1
ii  libsqlite3-0             3.31.1-4ubuntu0.2
ii  libstdc++6               10.3.0-1ubuntu1~20.04
ii  libtiff5                 4.1.0+git191117-2ubuntu0.20.04.1
ii  libwebp6                 0.6.1-2ubuntu0.20.04.1
ii  libx11-6                 2:1.6.9-2ubuntu1.2
ii  libxml2                  2.9.10+dfsg-5ubuntu0.20.04.1
ii  libxrandr2               2:1.5.2-0ubuntu1
ii  zlib1g                   1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.2

darktable recommends no packages.

darktable suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
David Bremner <[email protected]> writes:

> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Stas Zytkiewicz <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> -- System Information:
>> Debian Release: bullseye/sid
>>   APT prefers focal-updates
>>   APT policy: (500, 'focal-updates'), (500, 'focal-security'), (500, 'focal')
>> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Let me know if the problem can be replicated on Debian.

Stas confirmed in private mail that the packages they are using are from
OBS [1] (i.e. not from Debian). I'm fine with people doing their own
thing with the packaging source (it's free software), but I'd prefer if
they changed maintainer address to point to themselves. Sorry, I don't
know my way around OBS well enough to know who does maintain those
packages.

If someone has the same issue on Debian, feel free to re-open the bug.

By the way, the proposed solution is not suitable for Debian packages,
as those must be built from well defined source and without access to
the network. We have to do things the hard way, i.e. have updated
lensfun packages in Debian to build against. I guess it should work fine
for users to run the update command themselves, but I have not
investigated.

d

[1]: 
https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/graphics:/darktable/xUbuntu_20.10/

--- End Message ---
-- 
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel

Reply via email to