Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:01:39 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line closing bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #855359,
regarding darktable: 2.2.1 binary very slow compared to self-compiled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
855359: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855359
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: darktable
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: normal
The darktable binary from debian testing is very slow compared to a
self-compiled version.
1) apt-get install darktable
The darktable-cli benchmark I am using takes 22 seconds to complete
2) apt-get source darktable && compile myself
The darktable-cli benchmark takes only 15 seconds
I repeated the test several times.
Major performance difference.
My hardware: core i7-7700k with MSI.Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)
Matthias
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (200,
'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.10.0-rc8-mbo1 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages darktable depends on:
ii libatk1.0-0 2.22.0-1
ii libc6 2.24-9
ii libcairo-gobject2 1.14.8-1
ii libcairo2 1.14.8-1
ii libcolord-gtk1 0.1.26-1.1
ii libcolord2 1.3.3-2
ii libcups2 2.2.1-8
ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.52.1-2
ii libexiv2-14 0.25-3
ii libflickcurl0 1.26-2
ii libgcc1 1:6.3.0-6
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.36.4-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.50.2-2
ii libgomp1 6.3.0-6
ii libgphoto2-6 2.5.12-1
ii libgphoto2-port12 2.5.12-1
ii libgraphicsmagick-q16-3 1.3.25-7
ii libgtk-3-0 3.22.7-2
ii libice6 2:1.0.9-1+b1
ii libilmbase12 2.2.0-12
ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.5.1-2
ii libjs-prototype 1.7.1-3
ii libjs-scriptaculous 1.9.0-2
ii libjson-glib-1.0-0 1.2.2-1
ii liblcms2-2 2.8-4
ii liblensfun1 0.3.2-3
ii liblua5.2-0 5.2.4-1.1+b1
ii libopenexr22 2.2.0-11
ii libopenjp2-7 2.1.2-1.1
ii libosmgpsmap-1.0-1 1.1.0-1
ii libpango-1.0-0 1.40.3-3
ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.40.3-3
ii libpng16-16 1.6.28-1
ii libpugixml1v5 1.7-2
ii librsvg2-2 2.40.16-1
ii libsecret-1-0 0.18.5-2
ii libsm6 2:1.2.2-1+b1
ii libsoup2.4-1 2.56.0-2
ii libsqlite3-0 3.16.2-2
ii libstdc++6 6.3.0-6
ii libtiff5 4.0.7-5
ii libwebp6 0.5.2-1
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.4-3
ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1
ii libxml2 2.9.4+dfsg1-2.2
ii libxrandr2 2:1.5.1-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5
darktable recommends no packages.
darktable suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I don't think this is likely to be fixable in Debian. If someone feels
like working on these performance issues, feel free to reopen.
d
--- End Message ---
--
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
