Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2022 20:23:36 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: pngnq: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007514,
regarding pngnq: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1007514: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007514
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pngnq
Version: 1.0-2.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv
Dear maintainer,
This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.
Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.
It was noticed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html
that the conversion for this package is likely trivial, and builds bit-by-bit
identical binary packages.
This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html
Thanks
Lucas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.1+ds-1
The new upload already made the package to be of "3.0 (quilt)" format.
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:52:00 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> wrote:
> Source: pngnq
> Version: 1.0-2.3
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: bookworm sid
> Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
> bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has
many
> advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ;
(2)
> this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.
>
> Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
> could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
> look at other aspects as well.
>
> It was noticed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html
> that the conversion for this package is likely trivial, and builds bit-by-
bit
> identical binary packages.
>
>
> This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html
>
> Thanks
>
> Lucas
>
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
