Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2023 10:05:52 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#592090: netpbm: pgm -> ps goes horribly wrong
has caused the Debian Bug report #592090,
regarding netpbm: pgm -> ps goes horribly wrong
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
592090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592090
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: netpbm
Version: 2:10.0-12+lenny1
Severity: normal
I have a PGM file that pnmtops horribly mangles, as if it read the sequence of
pixel values serially into an image size of the wrong dimensions. I can e-mail
the PGM to you if you like. If I put ... | pnmtopng | pngtopnm | ... in the
shell pipeline then the problem goes away.
Mark
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.5
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (600, 'stable'), (50, 'testing'), (40, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages netpbm depends on:
ii libc6 2.10.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libjpeg62 6b-14 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libnetpbm10 2:10.0-12+lenny1 Shared libraries for netpbm
ii libpng12-0 1.2.27-2+lenny4 PNG library - runtime
ii libtiff4 3.8.2-11.3 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages netpbm recommends:
ii ghostscript-x [gs] 8.70~dfsg-2+b1 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF
netpbm suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2:11.01.00-2?
On 2023-08-22 Mark Carroll <[email protected]> wrote:
> > does this still apply to 2:11.01.00-2?
> I'm afraid that I no longer have any memory of what the file might
> possibly have been.
Hello Mark,
understandably since this happened 13 years ago. Thanks for the quick
reply!
I am closing the bug, as I do not see a productive way forward and
there have been a lot of changes to netpbm since.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
--- End Message ---
