On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 5:44 PM Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org> wrote:

> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> [0.9.x is pending the transition green light from debian-release team]
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 3:35 PM Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > Source: jpeg-xl
> > Version: 0.8.2-4
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian.org
> > Usertags: ftbfs-20240615 ftbfs-trixie
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on amd64.
> [...]
> > >
> > > The following tests FAILED:
> > >       1800 - DecodeTest.ExtentedBoxSizeTest (Failed)
>
> It looks like the testdata has changed one file in place. So libjxl
> 0.8.x and 0.9.x test suite do not seem to have a consistent behavior
> with the following file (*).
>
> Moritz, could you confirm that libjxl 0.8.x is expected to fail
> DecodeTest.ExtentedBoxSizeTest and as such should be considered an
> invalid release for Debian archive ?
>
I can confirm that libjxl 0.8.x is expected to fail on that. I don't know
the consequences like making this an invalid release for Debian archive.


>
> (*)
> % git log -- jxl/boxes/square-extended-size-container.jxl
> commit 8a1dafb89c27ce0d31ab98b122bafa65869e129a
> Author: Moritz Firsching <firsch...@google.com>
> Date:   Thu Nov 23 10:55:45 2023 +0100
>
>     fix extended size container
>
> commit f5158aa87916ffad4b5497bd1edf3ebab8aadbab
> Author: Moritz Firsching <firsch...@google.com>
> Date:   Wed Jun 15 13:53:10 2022 +0200
>
>     add jxl with extented size container (#5)
>

Reply via email to