>> > enblend CVS is actually very stable and still supports everything that >> > enblend-3.0 did. Would it help if enblend-3.1 was released soon?
>So, what's the reason why it has not been released so far? This kinda >sounds like doing the release in a hurry just to get it in time for >Lenny, which would be a rather bad thing. This is a real shame, it sounds like it is too late to catch the freeze. >Imho, the worst thing that could happen is to get enblend 3.1 into >unstable before the freeze so it will eventually migrate to testing / >Lenny and _then_ realize that there are still some major bugs that >cannot be resolved before Lenny. There are snapshots in fedora-9 (enblend 2008-05-29 & hugin 2008-05-28) apparently without problems, so these are 'good' - but fedora doesn't build on as many platforms as debian, and this doesn't help with possible toolchain/library differences. -- Bruno --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- _______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
