Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:18:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#446653: Attempting to use PTStitcher crashes hugin has caused the Debian Bug report #446653, regarding Attempting to use PTStitcher crashes hugin to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 446653: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446653 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: hugin Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: normal I have used Hugin successfully for many image panoramas using the "nona" engine, but I would like to use the exposure correction provided by the "PTSticher" engine. Any time I attempt to perform a render using PTSticher, a file prompt appears, which I fill-in, and then the stitching-in-progress dialog appears for a short time (less than a second) before Hugin exits with only the message "Illegal instruction" given in its terminal output. The exit code of the program is 132. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages hugin depends on: ii hugin-bin 0.6.1-1+b1 hugin binaries ii hugin-tools 0.6.1-1+b1 some tools for hugin ii libpano12-bin 2.8.3-1 panorama tools utilities hugin recommends no packages. -- no debconf informationsignature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-1 Brian Sipos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (11/08/2008): > Yes, the new exposure correction is a major improvement and, I > suppose, would invalidate this bug. I recommend closing the bug. Thanks, acting accordingly. Mraw, KiBi.signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel