+ Cyril Brulebois (Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:27:47 +0200):

> Hi folks,

> I've put openexr in pkg-phototools/openexr.git[1], and I welcome any
> review.

> Adeodato, Andrew, any problem with my putting your initial packaging
> under the same license as the upstream sources, using © lines based on
> the changelog entries?

Sure, please do that.

>  1. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-phototools/openexr.git

> I think that what I've got with library-diff isn't really worrying, but
> I'd like to read about weak symbols before uploading (that script of
> mine outputs a diff on the output of nm run against .so files). The
> output is attached, for reference (you may want to use c++filt as some
> point if you wish to dig into it).

> (Adeodato: I've retagged with signed tags, given I was already moving
> the repository, I thought it shouldn't impact too many people.)

> Everyone: your review is welcome. And thanks for your time. :)

Looks good to me, thanks for adopting!

-- 
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
        -- Rory and Lorelai


_______________________________________________
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel

Reply via email to