On 2009-07-19 Christian Garbs <deb...@cgarbs.de> wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 0.8.0-1~1 > Severity: wishlist
> Yesterday hugin 0.8.0 was released. I've already prepared Debian > packages for the preceding release candidates and now there is a > package of version 0.8.0 as well. > Feel free to have a look at the package from my repository to update > the official Debian package accordingly. There have been some changes > in the hugin build process - working around them need not be done > twice. > I also provide an up-to-date version of libpano13-0. > deb http://www.cgarbs.de/stuff ./ > deb-src http://www.cgarbs.de/stuff ./ > Both packages are tested and work for me. I've postfixed my version > numbers with ~1 so as not to clash with official Debian packages. [...] Hello, libpano13 is up to date in experimental. 2.9.14 rc1 is identical to the final 2.9.14 release iirc. (The library package name needs to be libpano13-1 btw.) Hugin is up to date in phototools git repo http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-phototools/hugin.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/experimental packages for lenny (should work on sid, too.) built from this code are on <http://www.bebt.de/debian/dists/lenny/hugin080/>. Basically the only thing that kept me from uploading to experimental was debian/copyright, see e.g: Files: src/hugin1/tests/test_projections.cpp src/hugin1/tools_vips/img2vips.cpp src/hugin1/tools_vips/hdrmerge_vips.cpp src/hugin1/tools_vips/img2vips.cpp Copyright: NONE License: NONE I started trying to resolve the unclear stuff but was not very successful. I am not sure whether this is resolvable at all or we can/should believe in good faith. hugin 0.7.0 in sid is not better in that respect. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' _______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel