Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (02/08/2009): > Thanks for that really appreciated patch.
A couple of questions though:
| Files in second .changes but not in first
| -----------------------------------------
| -rw-r--r-- root/root /etc/udev/rules.d/z60_libgphoto2-2.rules
| -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/libgphoto2-2/README.apidocs
| -rw-r--r-- root/root DEBIAN/conffiles
| -rwxr-xr-x root/root DEBIAN/preinst
|
| Files in first .changes but not in second
| -----------------------------------------
| -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/libgphoto2-2-dev/DAEMON.gz
| -rwxr-xr-x root/root /lib/udev/check-ptp-camera
Did you observe that? The first file seems to use the deprecated filename
scheme, doesn't it? Also, it looks quite empty, so I'm not sure everything's
working properly. Quoting it:
| # udev rules file for libgphoto2 devices (for udev 136 version)
| # Created from this library:
| # libgphoto2 2.4.6.5 gcc, ltdl, EXIF
| # libgphoto2_port 0.8.0 gcc, ltdl, USB, serial without locking
| #
| # this file is autogenerated, local changes will be LOST on upgrades
| SUBSYSTEM!="usb", GOTO="libgphoto2_rules_end"
| ENV{DEVTYPE}!="usb_device", GOTO="libgphoto2_rules_end"
| ACTION!="add", GOTO="libgphoto2_rules_end"
|
| ENV{ID_USB_INTERFACES}=="", IMPORT{program}="usb_id --export %p"
|
|
| LABEL="libgphoto2_rules_end"
I didn't apply the hal patch yet, but it'd be appreciated if you could let me
know if that's expected. I'm going to push my current work to the experimental
branch of our packaging repository; possibly with the 3rd of your patches later
today. Comments/fixes are appreciated.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
