Dear maintainers, you might consider doing a no-change upload for your package to get rid of a bin-NMU and restore multiarch co-installability. Ensure to build in a really clean sid chroot, otherwise another binNMU could be required to "fix" your package and break MA co-installability again.
If you file an unblock request, you should include a *binary* debdiff to the packages in testing, too, to ensure no library dependencies from unstable get picked up. On 2013-04-27 10:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 01:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> a few Multi-Arch: same packages have all their dependencies satisfied, >> but are not co-installable because they got binNMUs. A sourceful >> no-change upload to rebuild them should restore co-installability. >> I've identified 8 source packages where this would help: >> bogl >> clutter-gst >> libdmtx >> libftdi >> libopenraw >> libpano13 >> lua-sql >> myodbc > > Note that such issues are not RC for wheezy. If the maintainers are > interested in fixing them, I might be minded to accept such changes, but > it would need to be /very/ soon. I have to admit to being concerned > about changes that might be introduced by a rebuild of a package in > unstable after several months though... On 2013-04-27 10:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Alternatively, we can look at fixing these issues for the first point > release. That gives us more time to evaluate any potential side-effects > of the rebuilds. Andreas PS: libdmtx would have to go via t-p-u, I'll look into this in more detail because there is another issue, too _______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel