On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:54:37PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Friday 29 February 2008, CJ van den Berg wrote: > > can you explain why you consider this a pulseaudio bug? I don't know too > > much about SELinux I'm afaid, but this looks like a problem with the > > SELinux policy. I don't see how pulseaudio is supposed to avoid/solve > > this problem. > > Yes, now the ownership issue has been addressed. It should be re-assigned to > the selinux policy package. > There was no clear indication to wether each individual package should > provide > a policy or not. Now that has been made clear. > > Can you please re-assign it to the selinux package ?
Could you retest with pulseaudio 0.9.15 Thanks, Sjoerd -- The University of California Statistics Department; where mean is normal, and deviation standard. _______________________________________________ Pkg-pulseaudio-devel mailing list Pkg-pulseaudio-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-pulseaudio-devel