Control: tags -1 = upstream help (adding back the bug to CC).
On 6 October 2016 at 09:57, Dominik George <n...@naturalnet.de> wrote: > Hi Felipe, > >> The situation has changed a bit: pulseaudio upstream is receptive to >> shipping such headers provided they have a define that users >> explicitly need to be set (so that people do not unsuspectingly use >> it), because the module api is not easily stabilized at the moment. I >> believe that this is just lacking someone that implement this at the >> moment. So maybe the bug should be untagged wontfix. I'm removing the wontfix tag. Tagged help as patches welcome. > > How would I go about that? Would I find out what APIs the module needs > to build, then ask upstream to add them to their shipped header files, What I remember from the last discussion with upstream is that they are receptive to patches, but are not themselves working on it. So s/ask upstream/propose a patch upstream/. > then wait for them to find their way into the Debian pulseaudio-dev > package? I will probably put them in a separate package, but yes, that would be the idea (I could be persuaded to backport the patch if the next release is too far away). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-pulseaudio-devel mailing list pkg-pulseaudio-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-pulseaudio-devel