El dl 13 de 02 de 2017 a les 13:30 +0100, en/na Javier Serrano Polo va
escriure:
> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-alsa-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> 
> El dc 21 de 09 de 2016 a les 10:36 -0300, Felipe Sateler va escriure:
> > Alsa maintainers, what do you think?
> 
> Maintainers remain silent.
> 
> > Adding a similar check for a variable named
> > like PULSE_DISABLE_ALSA_PLUGIN or something like that should be
> > very
> > simple.
> 
> Felipe, what do you prefer? To apply the patch with
> PULSE_ALSA_HOOK_CONF
> in pulseaudio or if I implement PULSE_DISABLE_ALSA_PLUGIN in ALSA and
> you do a NMU?

I think PULSE_DISABLE_ALSA_PLUGIN sounds fine, but please propose the
patch to alsa-devel@, and after it is accepted, I am open to apply it
in Debian. I don't want to drag this patch forever.

-- 
Jordi Mallach PĂ©rez  --  Debian developer     http://www.debian.org/
jo...@sindominio.net     jo...@debian.org     http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
pkg-pulseaudio-devel mailing list
pkg-pulseaudio-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-pulseaudio-devel

Reply via email to