Dear maintainers, On 2023-02-11 00:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Source: puma > Version: 5.6.5-2 > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: flaky > > Dear maintainer(s), > > Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails from time to > time. > From > https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/puma/testing/amd64/ > > openssl/3.0.8-1 failed > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/puma/31159611/log.gz > openssl/3.0.8-1 passed > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/puma/31166222/log.gz > > s390x, failed: > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/p/puma/31163926/log.gz > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/p/puma/31207049/log.gz > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/p/puma/31207176/log.gz > > then passed > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/p/puma/31207506/log.gz > > My understanding is that the error is a different in the three failures > on s390x. > > Could you please have a look?
As additional data points, it fails evens for the migration reference run very close in time, so with the exact same set of packages: success: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/puma/35598630/log.gz failure: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/puma/35598629/log.gz Could you please have a look? It's annoying for other maintainers to get their package blocked by this one. Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
