Package: vagrant Version: 2.3.4+dfsg-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? HashiCorp adopts the BSL. https://ir.hashicorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/hashicorp-adopts- business-source-license-future-releases-its Currently, vagrant 2.3.4+dfsg-1 was packaged in debian. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Should we keep non-BSL licenced version (A) or drop it (B)? * What was the outcome of this action? Plan A. - Update to 2.3.7 and hold it. (2.3.7 is the last non-BSL licenced version) - Follow a newer version only when BSL limitation expired (4 years). - As a result, we can't use newer feature in timely manner if you stick on packaged vagrant in Debian. Plan B. - Drop vagrant because of that changed licence and no need to keep older vagrant. - No vagrant avaiable in Debian. Just use upstream's package. * What outcome did you expect instead? N/A _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers