Your message dated Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:57:44 -0300 (BRT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #446996,
regarding mongrel: should not depend on rubygems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
446996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446996
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mongrel
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
>From what I remember from our rubygems discussions, the conclusion was
that the rubygems package was here for users to install packages, not
for other packages to use it. [0]
[0] http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/rubygems.html
That's why several packages apply patches during build, so they don't
need rubygems anymore.
However, it's not the case of mongrel: it depends on rubygems.
Should we fix mongrel, or change our position on rubygems?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
this discussion seems to be over - gems is in the mirror, and it would be
a lot of useless efort and patches to upstream source to remove gems
depends for mongrel package.
So, closing it.
filipe {
@ icewall.org
GPG 1024D/A6BA423E
http://filipe.icewall.org/
}
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
