On 17/01/11 at 13:53 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote: > Hello, All. > > I cloned svn repo with git-svn and experimented a little bit. > > Local repo size: > Git: 34M > SVN: 598M > > WTF? 598MB and there is no local history? > > Ok. I checked out topmost directory. Lets check trunk/ > $ cd trunk > $ du -sh > 84M > > Much better, but: > > - no history > - no light branches > - no my own repos at gitorious.org or github.com > > Last time git as our primary VCS was discussed here in 2009: > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/2009-July/003770.html > > Maybe I do not understand all tricks done after I uploaded my > package but I think there is no problems with switching to git > (only benefits). > > I pushed git repo with all svn history to: > http://gitorious.org/debian-pkg-ruby-extras/pkg-ruby-extras > git clone git://gitorious.org/debian-pkg-ruby-extras/pkg-ruby-extras.git > > I made simple dbuild.rb script for automating: > - download > - unpack tar > - debuild > > You can find it in git repo. > > Almost every big ruby project use git today. Why should we use SVN? > > So. I would like to know your cons/pros about switching to git. > > Its my '+1' for git for pkg-ruby-extras.
svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git. That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on svn-bp. - Lucas _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers