Now when rails-4.0 hit sid, I would like to resume the talk on what to do with rails in Debian.
I propose to be much more aggressive and keep only the latest/greatest upstream version, even if that means leaving some packages behind and not released (we can always use backports, etc.). The state when we have released rails-2.3 in wheezy is very sad, and it should not have happened. It would be better to have wheezy without redmine (etc.) than to have rails-2.3 in wheezy. The opposing view would be that rails is more similar to ruby itself and we have multiple ruby-1.8 / ruby-1.9.1 / ruby-2.0 / ... in the archive. Opinions? Ondrej On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > what's your opinion on rails(-defaults) pkg? > > Should we bump it to 3.2 or just remove it and keep only rails3? > > (And what to do when rails-4.0 is out?) > > O. > -- > Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> > -- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
