On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:08:17 -0500 Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> wrote: > >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Hindley <m...@hindley.org.uk> writes: > > Mark> Thanks for your considered response. I understand and accept that > you don't > Mark> think this is the correct solution to the issue. > > Mark> However, the underlying issue of how to facilitate migration of a > system from > Mark> libpam-systemd to libpam-elogind remains. Do you have other > suggestions of how > Mark> we might address this or find a solution? > > I'm very interested in michael's response. I wanted to make Mark aware > of a likely future discussion. With his policy hat on, Russ said he's > going to start a discussion on debian-devel about how to track > dependencies on system services rather than on packages. > So, for example, to track the availability of the tmpfiles service, > rather than simply that systemd or opentmpfiles is installed. > > I think Russ is aware of the elogind issues, but I think bringing those > issues up in that discussion or reaching out to Russ would both be good > ideas. > > That may be a more long-term solution. > So, I think it would still be great to get any input Michael has here.
Tbh, I'm not sure what kind of answer you expect from me. I guess I already provided my feedback here and mentioned what kind of solution I prefer. I can repeat this in this bug report, but I'm not sure if this is helpful. If I misunderstood what your intentions are, I apologize. Please be more specific then. Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
