On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 19:31:14 +0200 =?utf-8?q?Michael_B=C3=BCsch?= <m...@bues.ch> wrote:
Package: udev
Version: 254~rc2-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@bues.ch

Dear Maintainer,

when reporting a udev bug via reportbug the tool auto-attaches the complete
udev database dump to the report.

That came as a complete surprise to be. I didn't see any mention of that in the
report process.
Nor was there a way to prevent the attachment.

I think auto-attaching the complete udev database is a confidentiality problem.
The udev database might contain sensitive information that the reporter did not
want to disclose to the public internet.

Think of Luks DM names for example. The reporter is free to choose any name for
them. The reporter might not have thought about that the name can end up being
posted to the public internet when the reporter choose a name for the DM
device.

Besides that, the udev database is a very large fingerprint of the hardware
that the user uses.
By posting the udev database to the public internet, that hardware is
permanently associated to the reporter's name. That may be a problem. Think of
illegal things being done with the hardware after the original reporter sold
the hardware to somebody else.

Please also keep in mind that not all Debian users live in free countries with
free speech.
Associating hardware to people might be a major threat to people in such
countries. Think of plausible deniability of ownership, for example.

Therefore, my suggestion is:
- Please make the posting of the udev database optional.
- Also, please make it obvious that the complete database is posted during the
process, if the option is chosen. And explain to the reporter what that
database contains.


I posted a MR here
https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/merge_requests/207

The default is to include the information. If you have suggestions to the wording, please follow-up in the MR.

Regards,
Michael

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to