Am 04.12.2015 um 09:35 schrieb Martin Pitt: > Hello, > > Michael Biebl [2015-12-03 21:38 +0100]: >>>> Yes. The only problem though is that it requires the admin to correctly >>>> specify which interfaces are "auto" and which are "hotplug", because >>>> ifupdown cannot really figure that out itself. And there might be some >>>> cases where a virtual interface depends on one or more hotpluggable >>>> ones. >> >> I actually think this ifupdown-wait-online service should block for >> allow-hotplug devices as well. > > But then we must not use that from networking.service or anywhere else > from the boot sequence. The whole point of "allow-hotplug" is that > these devices may not be present at boot (USB devices).
In theory, I agree. In practice, the debian-installer has used allow-hotplug for all devices since a few release cycles. So I assume the vast majority of users has allow-hotplug in their /e/n/i, even for "internal" devices (onboard, PCI, etc). -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
