On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:32:42PM +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Your analysis seems to be correct. Until systemd is fixed, you should > > not use RestrictAddressFamilies= > > > > I'm not sure whether we will get v233 for stretch and if backporting > > those upstream fixes for v232 is feasible. > > Would it be possible then to temporarily patch systemd as will be > shipped in Stretch to just fail loading the unit with a descriptive > error message if it contains the RestrictAddressFamilies directive *and* > systemd is running on a 32-bit architecture (I think we have i686 and > x32 by now)?
or, even better, not fail outright but ignore RestrictAddressFamilies and issue a warning about it? Florian _______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
