Your message dated Wed, 27 May 2026 15:45:50 +0200
with message-id
<t7z6axbtoof5i5tbfw2cl764bufmlvz6rlcdp2cdh6ixpohsxi@ubjg3iic7djo>
and subject line Re: udisks2 uses pidof but does not depend on procps
has caused the Debian Bug report #1136600,
regarding udisks2 uses pidof but does not depend on procps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1136600: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1136600
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: udisks2
Version: 2.11.1-1
Usertags: pidof-without-procps
Dear maintainer(s) of udisks2,
it appears that udisks2 uses `pidof` in its testsuite, or that
at least one of its binary packages uses `pidof` at runtime.
Historically, `pidof` was provided by the Essential package
`sysvinit-tools`, making an explicit dependency unnecessary. However
`pidof` will soon be moved to `procps` and will no longer be part of
the Essential set.
Please add an explicit dependency on `procps`:
* via the `Depends:` field of all binary packages of udisks2
that use `pidof` at runtime;
* via the `Build-Depends:` field of udisks2, if `pidof` is
used in tests run at build-time;
* via the `Depends:` field of `debian/control/tests`, if `pidof` is
used in autopkgtests.
To prevent any disruption for users of udisks2, please add
this dependency now, before `pidof` is moved from `sysvinit-utils` to
`procps`. Alternatively, you could remove all uses of `pidof`.
It is believed that udisks2 uses `pidof` due to the following
code snippets:
```
path: udisks2_2.11.1-1/src/tests/dbus-tests/test_19_lsm.py
# check that lsmd is running
ret, _out = cls.run_command('pidof lsmd')
if ret != 0:
udiskstestcase.UdisksTestCase.tearDownClass()
```
Feel free to close this issue if this is a false positive (for example
if this code is in an unreachable code path).
Regards,
--
Gioele Barabucci
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 01:33:20AM +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> Source: udisks2
> Version: 2.11.1-1
> Usertags: pidof-without-procps
[...]
>
> ```
> path: udisks2_2.11.1-1/src/tests/dbus-tests/test_19_lsm.py
> # check that lsmd is running
> ret, _out = cls.run_command('pidof lsmd')
> if ret != 0:
> udiskstestcase.UdisksTestCase.tearDownClass()
> ```
>
> Feel free to close this issue if this is a false positive (for example
> if this code is in an unreachable code path).
The package is not build with --enable-lsm (or --enable-modules or
--enable-available-modules), thus this particular test is unused.
We also completely lack the libStorageMgmt in Debian needed for
--enable-lsm so it's not likely it will get enabled any time soon either.
I'm thus taking the liberty of concluding I can close this bug report.
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers
