Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mer, 2009-04-29 at 08:55 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> That's why I proposed the idea of an additional/separate env var, that will >> only >> be set for console logins, so we can easily differentiate X11 from console >> logins in Xsession.d/90consolekit. > > That could be a good idea. In fact, what we want (correct me if I'm > wrong) is a way, in 90consolekit, to know if we should override the > currently running CK session or not. If there's no session, fine, run > inconditionnaly, but if there's already a CK session there might be > multiple cases (CK-aware DM, CK-pam + DM, CK-pam + console), in some > cases the CK-session should be kept, in some other it should be > overriden. > > Am I correct? Yeah, I think this sums it up pretty good. Another idea I'm currently contemplating, is to make ck-launch-session more clever, i.e. run ck-launch-session unconditionally in 90consolekit, and let ck-launch-session check itself, if there is already a CK session registered for the user/tty Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers
