also sprach Michael Biebl <[email protected]> [2009.05.08.2258 +0200]: > What are you trying to do, why do you need such a --direct option for > hal-get-property? > Could you please describe in more detail what your problem is.
#524098 -- I was trying to implement your suggestion in that bug report: remove properties and only assign defaults to ones that were empty by the time the callout is invoked. For that, I need hal-get-property, right? I don't care about --direct or not, but if hal-set-property works in the same script where hal-get-property does not, and --direct is the most obvious difference between them, I am lead to believe that --direct for hal-get-property would let me get on with things. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[email protected]> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems seen on an advertising for an elaborate swiss men's watch: "almost as complicated as a woman. except it's on time"
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers
